The Relationship between Principles-Based Accounting Rules and Audit Fees

  • Dawna Drum
  • Zenghui Liu
  • Huishan Wan University of Northern Iowa

Abstract

            This paper examines the relations between principles-based accounting standards and audit fees. Our empirical evidence suggests auditors charge a lower fee when firms’ standards are more principles based. Our result is consistent with the notion that principles-based accounting standards improve earnings quality and reduce auditor’s risk-related premium. Further analyses indicate this fee saving is more pronounced for firms with stronger corporate governance and firms in post-SOX era. The results add to the growing body of literature examining cost/benefit of principles-based accounting standards, as well as to the literature of the determinants of audit fees.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession. (2008). Final Report of the Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Tersedia di https://www.treasury.gov/about/organizational-structure/offices/Documents/final-report.pdf.

Ahmed, A. S., Neel, M., & Wang, D. (2013). Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality? Preliminary evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1344-1372.

Agoglia, C. P., Doupnik, T. S., & Tsakumis, G. T. (2011). Principles-based versus rules-based accounting standards: The influence of standard precision and audit committee strength on financial reporting decisions. The Accounting Review, 86(3), 747-767.

Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B. (2003). Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611-639.

Badertscher, B., Jorgensen, B., Katz, S., & Kinney, W. (2014). Public equity and audit pricing in the United States. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(2), 303-339.

Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., & Yang, J. S. (2003). Auditor industry specialization and earning quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22(2), 71-79.

Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467-498.

Brochet, F., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Riedl, E. J. (2013). Mandatory IFRS adoption and financial statement comparability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1373-1400.

Byard, D., Li, Y., & Yu, Y. (2011). The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on financial analysts’ information environment. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(1), 69-96.

Chan, A. L., Hsu, A. W., & Lee, E. (2013). Does mandatory IFRS adoption affect the credit ratings of foreign firms cross-listed in the US? Accounting Horizons, 27(3), 491-510.

Chang, H., Cheng, C. S. A., & Reichelt, K. J. (2010). Market reaction to auditor switching from Big 4 to third-tier small accounting firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 29(2), 83-114.

Chang, H., Chen, J., Chen, H., & Kim, S. (2014). The effect of supply chain knowledge spillovers on audit pricing. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(1), 83-100.

Chung, H. H., Wynn, J. P., & Yi, H. (2013). Litigation risk, accounting quality, and investment efficiency. Advances in Accounting, 29(2), 180-185.

Cohen, D. A., Dey, A., & Lys, T. Z. (2008). Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 757-787.

Cornell, R., Magro, A., & Warne, R. (2017). Understanding investors’ propensity to litigate: The role of perceived reporting flexibility and assessed management responsibility for harmful events. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(3), 317-340.

Craswell, A., Francis, J., & Taylor, S. (1995). Audit brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20, 297-322.

DeFond, M., & Lennox, C. (2011). The effect of SOX on small auditor exits and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52, 21-40.

De George, E., Ferguson, C., & Spear, N. (2013). How much does IFRS cost? IFRS adoption and audit fees. The Accounting Review, 88(2), 429-462.

Deloitte. (2008). 2008 IFRS Survey: Where Are We Today? New York, NY: Deloitte & Touche LLP.

Donelson, D. C., McInnis, J. M., & Mergenthaler, R. D. (2012). Rules-based accounting standards and litigation. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1247-1279.

Donelson, D. C., McInnis, J. M., & Mergenthaler, R. D. (2016). Explaining rules-based characteristics in U.S. GAAP: Theories and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(3), 827-861.

Folsom, D., Hribar, P., Mergenthaler, R. D., & Peterson, K. (2016). Principles-based standards and earnings attributes. Management Science, 63(8), 2592-2615.

Gimbar, C., Hansen, B., & Ozlanski, M. E. (2016). The effect of critical audit matter paragraphs and accounting standard precision on auditor liability. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1629-1646.

Gotti, G., Han, S., Higgs, J., & Kang, T. (2010). Managerial stock ownership, analyst coverage and audit fee. Working paper.

Grenier, J., Pomeroy, B., & Stern, M. (2015). The effects of accounting standard precision, auditor task expertise, and judgment frameworks on audit firm litigation exposure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1), 336-357.

Hay, D. (2013). Further evidence from meta-analysis of audit fee research. International Journal of Auditing, 17, 162-176.

Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23, 141-191.

Herz, R. (2003). A year of challenge and change for the FASB. Accounting Horizons, 17, 247-255.

Hribar, P., Kravet, T., & Wilson, R. (2014). A new measure of accounting quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1), 506-538.

Hogan, C. E., & Wilkins, M. S. (2008). Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies? Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 105-126.

Houston, R., Peters, M., & Pratt, J. (1999). The audit risk model, business risk and audit-planning decisions. The Accounting Review, 74(3), 281-298.

Houston, R., Peters, M., & Pratt, J. (2005). Nonlitigation risk and pricing audit services. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(1), 37-53.

Hua, S., Liu, Z., Sun, X. C., & Yu, J. (2016). Auditor bargaining power and audit fee lowballing. Advances in Business Research, 7, 81-89.

Jamal, K., & Tan, H. (2010). Joint effects of principles-based versus rules-based standards and auditor type in constraining financial managers’ aggressive reporting. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1325-1346.

Jamal, K., Colson, R. H., Bloomfield, R. J., Christensen, T. E., Moehrle, S. R., & Ohlson, J. (2010). A research-based perspective on SEC’s proposed rule on roadmap for potential use of financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by U.S. issuers. Accounting Horizons, 24(1), 139-147.

Kadous, K., & Mercer, M. (2016). Are juries more likely to second-guess auditors under imprecise accounting standards? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(1), 101-117.

Ke, B., Petroni, K., & Safieddine, A. (1999). Ownership concentration and sensitivity of executive pay to accounting performance measures: Evidence from publicly and privately-owned insurance companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28, 185-209.

Kim, J., Liu, X., & Zheng, L. (2012). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on audit fees: Theory and evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 2061-2094.

Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 163-197.

KPMG. (2007). International Financial Reporting Standards: The Quest for a Global Language. London, U.K.: KPMG LLP.

Krishnan, G. V., Sun, L., Wang, Q., & Yang, R. (2013). Client risk management: A pecking order analysis of auditor response to upward earnings management risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(2), 147-169.

Lobo, G. J., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Relation between audit effort and financial report misstatements: Evidence from quarterly and annual restatements. The Accounting Review, 88(4), 1385-1412.

Mergenthaler, R. D. (2011). Principles-based versus rule-based standards and accounting irregularities. Working paper, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Palmrose, Z. (1986). Audit fees and audit size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97-110.

Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2006). SOX Section 404 material weakness disclosures and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 25, 99-114.

Ramalingegowda, S., & Yu, Y. (2012). Institutional ownership and conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, 98-114.

Reichelt, K. J., & Wang, D. (2010). National and office specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3), 647-686.

Salman, F., & Carson, E. (2009). The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the audit fees of Australian listed firms. The International Journal of Auditing, 13, 127-140.

Schipper, K. (2003). Principles-based accounting standards. Accounting Horizons, 17, 61-72.

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2013). Work Plan for the Consideration of Incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards into the Financial Reporting System for U.S. Issuers: Final Staff Report. Tersedia di https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/globalaccountingstandards/ifrs-work-plan-final-report.pdf.

Seetharaman, A., Gul, F., & Lynn, S. (2002). Litigation risk and audit fees: Evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 91-115.

Simunic, D. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161-190.

Simunic, D., & Stein, M. (1996). The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15, 119-134.

Skinner, D. J., & Srinivasan, S. (2012). Audit quality and auditor reputation: Evidence from Japan. The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1737-1765.

Venkataraman, R., Webber, J., & Willenborg, M. (2008). Litigation risk, audit quality, and audit fees: Evidence from initial public offerings. The Accounting Review, 83(5), 1315-1345.

Vermeer, T. E., Raghunandan, K., & Forgione, D. A. (2009). Audit fees at U.S. non-profit organizations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 289-303.

Whisenant, S., Sankaraguruswamy, S., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). Evidence on the joint determinations of audit and non-audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(4), 721-744.

Xie, B., Davidson, W., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295-316.
Published
2025-05-07
How to Cite
DRUM, Dawna; LIU, Zenghui; WAN, Huishan. The Relationship between Principles-Based Accounting Rules and Audit Fees. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management (JABM), [S.l.], v. 32, n. 1, p. 1-26, may 2025. ISSN 2622-2167. Available at: <https://journal.stie-mce.ac.id/index.php/jabminternational/article/view/1000>. Date accessed: 08 may 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.31966/jabminternational.v32i1.1000.
Section
Articles