Metaheuristic-Driven Optimization for Complex Multidimensional Decision-Making:
A Case Study on Prioritizing Airport Locations
Abstract
Effective management accounting procedures necessitate a thorough evaluation of discrepancies and variability in decision-making processes. However, conventional statistical measures often generate misleading results. In this research, we present the Mean Squares of Criteria and Alternatives (MESCA) metaheuristic approach to multifaceted decision-making. MESCA is specially designed to tackle intricate, multidimensional dilemmas, making it exceptionally suitable for scenarios involving conflicting or competing constraints. This, in turn bolsters the confidence levels of decision-makers, ultimately fostering more informed and enhanced decision-making processes. In this case study, we employ a metaheuristic approach to determine the optimal airport location, contrasting it with the established Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) model. Our research follows a deductive, survey-based methodology, with a focus on prioritizing cities within East Azerbaijan province for airport placement. We consider ten indicators, including economic factors and safety standards, to evaluate the suitability of alternative locations. The comparative analysis between the MESCA method and the SECA model accentuates the advantages of metaheuristic approach over the SECA model, offering valuable insights for effective management decisions. Our findings confirm that both approaches concur in identifying the same city as the most favorable alternative based on the established criteria. Moreover, our research demonstrates that the MESCA method surpasses the SECA model in terms of simplicity, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness, crucial considerations in the realm of management accounting. These revelations provide essential guidance to airport specialists and decision-makers when navigating constraints and selecting optimal airport locations.
Downloads
References
[1] Willmott. c.j. Matsuura, K . Robeson, S. M, 2009. Ambiguities inherent in sums-of-squares-based error statistics, Atmospheric Environment, Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 749-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.005
[2] Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Zenonas Turskis & Simona Kildienė (2014) State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20:1, 165-179
[3] Zimmermann, H. Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, 2nd ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, USA, 1991.
[4] Jahan, A.; Edwards, K. L. 2013. VIKOR method for material selection problems with interval numbers and target-based criteria, Materials & Design 47: 759–765.
[5] Duxbury D. Keasey, K. Zhang, H. Chow,S,L2005. Mental accounting and decision making: Evidence under reverse conditions where money is spent for time saved. Journal of Economic Psychology ,Volume 26, Issue 4, , Pages 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2004.11.001.
[6] Elster, J.2001. Rational choice theory: Cultural Concerns. International Encyclopedia of the social & Behavioral Sciences. 12763-12768. doi. Org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04630-1.
[7] Glover, F., Sörensen, K., 2015. Scholarpedia. 10(4):6532. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.6532.
[8] Juan, J., Faulin, J., Grasman, S., Rabe, M., Figueira, G., 2015.A review of simheuristics: Extending metaheuristics to deal with stochastic combinatorial optimization problems. Operations Research Perspectives. 2, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2015.03.001.
[9] Doering, J.Kizys, R., Juan,A., Fito, A., Polat, O., 2019. Metaheuristics for rich portfolio optimisation and risk management: Currentstate and future trends. Operations Research Perspectives. 6, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2019.100121.
[10]Chiandussi, G., Codegone,m., Ferrero, S., Varesio, F,E., 2012. Comparison of multi-objective optimization methodologies for engineering applications. Computers and Mathematics with Applications.63,912-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.11.057.
[11] Jalaee A., Shakibaee, A., Horry, H., Akbarifard, H., Ghaseminejad, A., Robati,F., Zarin, A., 2021. A new hybrid metaheuristic method based on biogeography-based optimization and particle swarm optimization algorithm to estimate money demand in Iran. MethodsX, 8, 101226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101226.
[12]MoLi,M.QiangFu,Q.VijayP.Singh,V.J. DongLiu,D.,2018.An interval multi-objective programming model for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty. Agricultural Water Management,Volume 196, , Pages 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.10.016
[13] Yannis,G. Kopsacheili, A. Dragomanovits,A. Virginia Petraki,V.,2021.State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,413-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.05.005.
[14] Sitorus,F.Pablo R.Brito-Parada.,2020.A multiple criteria decision making method to weight the sustainability criteria of renewable energy technologies under uncertainty. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews .Volume 127, 109891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109891.
[15] Sharon,G., Stern,R., Felner,A.Sturtevant, N., 2015. Conflict-based search for optimal multi-agent pathfinding. Artificial Intelligence.219,40–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2014.11.006.
[16] Galagederaa, S., Pasindub,H., Adikariwattage,V., 2020. Evaluation of Operational Risk Factors at Runway High Speed Exits. Transportation Research Procedia. 48, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.004.
[17] Pirkelmann, S. Angeli, D. Grüne, L.,2019. Approximate computation of storage functions for discrete-time systems using sum-of-squares techniques. IFAC-PapersOnLine. Volume 52, Issue16,Pages 508-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.012
[18] Kim, B. Ryu, H. K. Heo, A.,2022. Mean squared error criterion for model-based design of experiments with subset selection. Computers & Chemical Engineering. Volume 159, 107667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107667.
[19] Biagi, S. Bonfiglioli,A. Bramant,M.,2021. Global estimates in Sobolev spaces for homogeneous Hörmander sums of squares. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. Volume 498, Issue 1, 124935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.124935
[20] Abstract of The Results of The Expenditure and Income Statistics Plan of Rural Urban Household., 2016. Statistical Center of Iran. Page18. https://www.amar.org.ir/.
[21] Iran Statistical Yearbook, Country Plan and Budget Organization. 2016. Statistical Center of Iran. Statistical Center of Iran. Page140. https://www.amar.org.ir/.
[22] Iran Statistical Yearbook, Country Plan and Budget Organization. 2016. Statistical Center of Iran. 476-483. https://www.amar.org.ir/.
[23] Chung, T.W., Lee,Y.J., Jang, H.M., 2016. location of airports - selected quantitative methods. Log Forum Scientific. J. of Logistics. 12(3), 283-295. DOI:10.17270/J.LOG.2016.3.8.
[24] Gibbons, S., Wu,W. 2019. Airports, Access and Local Economic Performance: Evidence from China. j. of Economic Geography. 20,903-937. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbz021.
[25] Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M.,Amiri,M., Zavadskas, E., 2018. Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. Vilnius University informatica Vol. 29, No. 2, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2018.167.
